Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700F is 386 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100T - 190 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €268.88 vs €322.64
- Up to 21% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100T - €1.42 vs €1.79 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €322.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€268.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |