Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 197 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |