Buy on Amazon
€129
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 932 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 184 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-9400F processore 2,9 GHz Box 9 MB Smart Cache
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
78.95500725689405%
Multi-Core
3898
80.6371534960695%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
