Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2114 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 15% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 155 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
53.94149727317799%
Multi-Core
3898
42.9295154185022%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |