Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2023 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-6320 - 120 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€327.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €327.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |