Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2256 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Minecraft than Core i3-6320 - 843 vs 696 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 24 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
843
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€352.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €352.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |