Buy on Amazon
€87.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $97
Availability
MSRP in USD: $97
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2338 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 51 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-6320 - 238 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 8 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-12100F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 12M, fino a 4,30 GHz
Buy for €87.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-6320
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
PC Builds Using Core i3-6320 or Core i3-12100F
Death Stranding, 1920 x 1080, Very High
104 FPS
Radeon RX 6600
Core i3-12100F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€N/A
Out of Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
