Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1703 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-6320 - 195 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€271.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €271.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |