Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 and the more expensive Celeron G3900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 33% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 335 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €60.38 vs €60.9
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €60.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74477 minutes ago
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74476 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
48.65996649916248%
Multi-Core
992
42.465753424657535%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |