Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 961 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - €35.36 vs €84.44
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2600 - €0.19 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |