Buy on Amazon
€18.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 272 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Celeron G1610 - 181 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €18.15 vs €88.88
- Up to 80% better value when playing Stray than Celeron G1610 - €0.1 vs €0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4130 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 54 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €18.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15198 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
