Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2219 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-3250 - 102 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €93.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
47.16312056737589%
Multi-Core
1130
31.22409505388229%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |