Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €10.69 vs €141.6
- Up to 92% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-7100 - €0.05 vs €0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3225 - 216 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3225 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
211
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for €141.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |