Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €10.69 vs €151.33
- Up to 86% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i3-10320 - €0.1 vs €0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 98% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-3225 - 204 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 8 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €10.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |