Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - €18.25 vs €137.73
- Up to 84% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i3-10300 - €0.03 vs €0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Core i3-3220 - 724 vs 676 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
676
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17053 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
724
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
15%
Price, €
€137.73
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €137.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17052 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |