Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 605 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1840 - 254 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - €9.9 vs €18.15
- Up to 43% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-3220 - €0.04 vs €0.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 53 vs 55 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €18.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |