Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 1338 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3930T - 240 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930T - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
