Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 848 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3930T - 185 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
