Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i3-1125G4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 50 days older than Core i3-1125G4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 28 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-1125G4 - 192 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 11004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |