Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 35% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 115 vs 85 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 85 vs 280 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1530.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,530.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |