Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-2400S - 270 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €31.97 vs €155.51
- Up to 76% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - €0.14 vs €0.58 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
24.13793103448276%
Price, €
€155.51
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €155.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3680 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
236
87.4074074074074%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
32.228719948018195%
Multi-Core
1352
29.226113272805883%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |