Buy on Amazon
€159.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 4007 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Phenom II X4 925 - 136 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €25.22 vs €159.18
- Up to 83% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-10320 - €0.2 vs €1.17 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
17.094017094017097%
Price, €
€159.18
15%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 394 minutes ago
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
126
92.64705882352942%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Processore CPU AMD Phenom II X4 925 95W 2,8 GHz Quad-Core HDX925WFK4DGI/HDX925WFK4DGM Presa AM3 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
20.79272254710851%
Multi-Core
930
20.103761348897535%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
