Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3719 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i5-2500 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - €69.02 vs €288.88
- Up to 77% better value when playing Control than Core i5-2500 - €0.34 vs €1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |