Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €119.46 vs €476.59
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900K - €1.11 vs €4.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10105 - 113 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €119.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.22/FPS
26%
Price, €
€476.59
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €476.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |