Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €119.46 vs €575.69
- Up to 77% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-13900F - €0.57 vs €2.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-10105 - 232 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €119.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.48/FPS
22%
Price, €
€575.69
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €575.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |