Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - 175 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - €84.44 vs €103.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10100 - €0.5 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11080 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
168
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11081 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |