Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1373 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-8700T - 110 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - €61.99 vs €308.12
- Up to 81% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-8700T - €0.56 vs €2.93 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€61.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3440 minutes ago
Buy for €308.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |