Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1947 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |