Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K and Celeron G3930T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 35 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 9% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3930T - 208 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
