Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 564 vs 500 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 60 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |