Buy on Amazon
€50.1
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1345 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6350 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
