Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1920 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-875K - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
