Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 765 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 16% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3900 - 198 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75493 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
46.666666666666664%
Multi-Core
992
29.133627019089577%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |