Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2044 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1820 - 270 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €93.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
43.52836879432624%
Multi-Core
825
22.796352583586625%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |