Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 363 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 90% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €7.0 vs €72.66
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91548 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
86.76171079429736%
Multi-Core
739
89.57575757575758%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |