Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-7960X

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-7960X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 1733 days newer than Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610

  • Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 55 vs 165 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7960X doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X

  • Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1610 - 715 vs 672 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Rocket League.
Rocket League

Rocket League

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

672

93%

Value, €/FPS

€0.13/FPS

100%

Price, €

€88.88

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017


FPS

715

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

FPS Winner

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

30%

Multi-Core

739

7%

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017


Single-Core

1376

100%

Multi-Core

10496

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

vs
Intel Core i9-7960X Logo

Intel Core i9-7960X

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Sep 1st, 2017
CeleronCollectionCore i9
Ivy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 2066
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
16
2Threads
32
2.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.2 GHz
55 W
TDP165 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
26.0xMultiplier
28.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.