Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T and Celeron 3865U have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron 3865U - 117 vs 116 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |