Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 897 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 3865U - 124 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
