Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron 3865U - 240 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
