Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2866 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 34% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 3205U - 197 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |