Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2591 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 6% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron 3205U - 189 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€169.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €169.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |