Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 272 days older than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Celeron 2955U - 162 vs 161 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |