Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2495 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Celeron 1000M - 83 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 4 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
83
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €83.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1322 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |