Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - €79.90 vs €367.85
- Up to 66% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 9 7900X - €0.44 vs €1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 56% better in War Thunder than Core i3-10105F - 286 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
183
64%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7168 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
34%
Price, €
€367.85
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €367.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7168 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |