Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €79.90 vs €433.75
- Up to 79% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-12900K - €0.45 vs €2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10105F - 205 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
21%
Price, €
€433.75
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €433.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |