Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €79.90 vs €365.83
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700K - €0.42 vs €1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105F - 219 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
25%
Price, €
€365.83
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €365.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |