In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-10105F is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 66% faster in Battlefield 6 – 128 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 66% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
77 FPS
60%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
59%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
