Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1737 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 54 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 423 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7779 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |