Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 947 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 194 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €242.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |