Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 7 8700G - €88.28 vs €302.57
- Up to 62% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 8700G - €0.24 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 30% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1610 - 478 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
369
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7253 minutes ago
Buy for €302.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7253 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |