Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - €88.28 vs €227.89
- Up to 56% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-12700KF - €0.76 vs €1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 14% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1610 - 132 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7535 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
44%
Price, €
€227.89
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €227.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7535 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |